Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Rock Type Connectivity Estimation Using Percolation Theory

  • Published:
Mathematical Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Complicated sedimentary processes control the spatial distribution of geological heterogeneities. This serves to make the nature of the fluid flow in the hydrocarbon reservoirs immensely complex. Proper modeling of these heterogeneities and evaluation of their connectivity are crucial and affects all aspects of fluid flow. Since the natural variability of heterogeneity occurs in a myriad of length scales, accurate modeling of the rock type connectivity requires a very fine scheme, which is computationally very expensive. Hence, this makes other alternative methods such as the percolation approach attractive and necessary. The percolation approach considers the hypothesis that a reservoir can be split into either permeable (sand/fracture) or impermeable rocks (shale/matrix). In this approach, the connectivity of the permeable fraction governs the flow. This method links the global properties of the system to the density of the permeable objects distributed randomly in the system. Moreover, this approach reduces many results to some simple master curves from which all-possible outcomes can be predicted by simple algebraic transformations. The current study contributes to extending the applicability of the methodology to anisotropic systems as well as using the complicated and more realistic sandbody shapes (for example, ellipsoids). This enables us to attain a better assessment of the connectivity and its associated uncertainty of the complicated rock types. Furthermore, to validate the approach, the Burgan reservoir dataset of the Norouz offshore oil field in the south of Iran was used. The findings are in conformity with the percolation approach predictions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler PM, Thovert JF (1999) Fractures and fracture networks. Kluwer Academic, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baker DR, Paul G, Sreenivasan S et al (2002) Continuum percolation threshold for interpenetrating squares and cubes. Phys Rev E 66:0546136. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.66.046136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belayneh M, Masihi M, Matthäi SK et al (2006) Prediction of vein connectivity using the percolation approach: model test with field data. J Geophys Eng 3:219–229. doi:10.1088/1742-2132/3/3/003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz B (1995) Analysis of fracture network connectivity using percolation theory. Math Geol 27:467–483. doi:10.1007/BF02084422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz B (2002) Characterizing flow and transport in fractured geological media: a review. Adv Water Resour 25:861–884. doi:10.1016/S0309-1708(02)00042-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz B, Balberg I (1993) Percolation theory and its application to groundwater hydrology. Water Resour Res 29:775–794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bour O, Davy P (1998) On the connectivity of three-dimensional fault networks. Water Resour Res 34:2611–2622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bridge JS, Leeder MR (1979) A simulation model of alluvial stratigraphy. Sedimentology 26:617–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent SR, Hammersley JM (1957) Percolation processes: I. Crystals and mazes. Math Proc Camb Philos Soc 53:629–641. doi:10.1017/S0305004100032680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapra SC, Canale R (2002) Numerical methods for engineers: with software and programming applications. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewing R, Gupta S (1993) Percolation and permeability in partially structured networks. Water Resour Res 29:3179–3188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flory PJ (1941) Molecular size distribution in three dimensional polymers: I. Gelation. J Am Chem Soc 69:30–35 doi:10.1021/ja01856a061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haldorsen HH, Brand PJ, Macdonald CJ (1988) Review of the stochastic nature of reservoirs. In: Edwards S, King PR (eds) Proceed math oil prod. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Haldorsen HH, Damsleth E (1990) Stochastic modelling (includes associated papers 21255 and 21299). J Pet Technol 42:404–412. doi:10.2118/20321-PA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoshen J, Berry MW, Minser KS (1997) Percolation and cluster structure parameters: the enhanced Hoshen-Kopelman algorithm. Phys Rev E 56:1456–1460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huerlimann A (2004) MDP report of Shell Company. Appendix seven of Soroosh & Nowrooz Burgan rock properties. Tehran, Iran

  • Hunt AG (2005) Percolation theory and the future of hydrogeology. Hydrogeol J 13:202–205. doi:10.1007/s10040-004-0405-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen JL, Hart JD, Willis BJ (2006) Evaluating proportions of undetected geological events in the case of erroneous identifications. Math Geol 38:103–112. doi:10.1007/s11004-005-9007-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King PR (1990) The connectivity and conductivity of overlapping sandbodies. In: Proceedings 2nd international conference of North Sea oil and gas reservoir. Graham & Trotman, London, pp 353–362

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick S (1971) Classical transport in disordered media: scaling and effective-medium theories. Phys Rev Let 27:1722–1725. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.27.1722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick S (1973) Percolation and conduction. Rev Mod Phys 45:574–588. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.45.574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knudby C, Carrera J, Bumgardner JD et al (2006) Binary upscaling—the role of connectivity and a new formula. Adv Water Resour 29:590–604. doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2005.07.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koltermann CE, Gorelick SM (1996) Heterogeneity in sedimentary deposits: a review of structure-imitating, process-imitating, and descriptive approaches. Water Resour Res 32:2617–2658. doi:10.1029/96WR00025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee SB, Torquato S (1990) Monte Carlo study of correlated continuum percolation: universality and percolation thresholds. Phys Rev A 41:5338–5344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin CY, Hu CK (1998) Universal finite size scaling functions for percolation on three dimensional lattices. Phys Rev E 58:1521–1527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz CD, Ziff RM (2001) Precise determination of the critical percolation threshold for the three dimensional Swiss cheese model using a growth algorithm. J Chem Phys 114:3659–3661. doi:10.1063/1.1338506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Marsily G, Delay F, Gonsalves J et al (2005) Dealing with spatial heterogeneity. Hydrogeol J 13:161–183. doi:10.1007/s10040-004-0432-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masihi M, King PR (2007) A correlated fracture network: modeling and percolation properties. Water Resour Res 43:W07439. doi:10.1029/2006WR005331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masihi M, King PR, Nurafza P (2006) Effect of anisotropy on finite-size scaling in percolation theory. Phys Rev E 74:042102. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.74.042102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meester R, Roy R (1996) Continuum percolation. Cambridge University Press, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mukhopadhyay S, Sahimi M (2000) Calculation of the effective permeabilities of field-scale porous media. Chem Eng Sci 55:4495–4513. doi:10.1016/S0009-2509(00)00098-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mutti E, Normark WR (1991) An integrated approach to the study of turbidite systems. In: Weimer P, Link MH (eds) Seismic facies and sedimentary processes of submarine fans and turbidite systems. Springer, New York, pp 75–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Nurafza P, King PR, Masihi M (2006) Facies connectivity modelling: analysis and field study. In: Proceedings annual conference and exhibition of SPE Europec/EAGE, Vienna, Austria, SPE 100333

  • Ozkaya SI, Mattner J (2003) Fracture connectivity from fracture intersections in borehole image logs. Comput Geosci 29:143–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perram JW, Rasmussen J, Præstgaard E et al (1996) Ellipsoid contact potential: theory and relation to overlap potentials. Phys Rev E 54:6565–6572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prakash S, Havlin S, Schwartz M et al (1992) Structural and dynamical properties of long-range correlated percolation. Phys Rev A 46:R1724–R1727. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.46.R1724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ronayne MJ, Gorelick SM (2006) Effective permeability of porous media containing branching channel networks. Phys Rev E 73:026305. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.73.026305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadeghnejad S, Masihi M, King PR et al (2010a) Effect of anisotropy on the scaling of connectivity and conductivity in continuum percolation theory. Phys Rev E 81:061119. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.81.061119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadeghnejad S, Masihi M, King PR et al (2010b) Reservoir conductivity evaluation using percolation theory. Pet Sci Technol 29:1041–1053. doi:10.1080/10916460903502506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadeghnejad S, Masihi M, Shojaei A et al (2011) Field scale characterization of geological formations using percolation theory. Transp Porous Media 92:357–372. doi:10.1007/s11242-011-9907-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahimi M (1994) Applications of percolation theory. Taylor and Francis, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahimi M, Mukhopadhyay S (1996) Scaling properties of a percolation model with long-range correlations. Phys Rev E 54:3870–3880. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.54.3870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stauffer D, Aharony A (1994) Introduction to percolation theory. Taylor & Francis, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Stockmayer WH (1944) Theory of molecular size distribution and gel formation in branched polymers. J Chem Phys 12:125–132. doi:10.1063/1.1723803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tóth TM, Vass I (2011) Relationship between the geometric parameters of rock fractures, the size of percolation clusters and REV. Math Geosci 43:75–97. doi:10.1007/s11004-010-9315-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilke S, Guyon E, de Marsily G (1985) Water penetration through fractured rocks: test of a tridimensional percolation description. J Int Assoc Math Geol 17:17–27. doi:10.1007/BF01030364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xia W, Thrope MF (1988) Percolation properties of random ellipses. Phys Rev A 38:2650–2656. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.38.2650

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge useful conversations with Dr Tavakoli. In addition, we are grateful to the editor and reviewers who provided many useful suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemical Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

    Saeid Sadeghnejad

  2. Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, 11155-9465, Iran

    Mohsen Masihi & Mahmoudreza Pishvaie

  3. Earth Science & Engineering Department, Imperial College, London, UK

    Peter R. King

Authors
  1. Saeid Sadeghnejad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mohsen Masihi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mahmoudreza Pishvaie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Peter R. King
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohsen Masihi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sadeghnejad, S., Masihi, M., Pishvaie, M. et al. Rock Type Connectivity Estimation Using Percolation Theory. Math Geosci 45, 321–340 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-013-9446-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-013-9446-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation